Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
Chief Officer Assurance Statements form part of a wider force assurance map, designed to satisfy the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy Good Governance guidance, in which a very comprehensive list of requirements is specified together with examples of suitable supporting policies, procedures and key documents present.
For further information, including the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable, please visit the Commissioner's 'How We Work' page.
Deputy Chief Constable, Dave McLaren
All principal statutory obligations relating to my portfolio have been identified and are set out below:
The framework clearly sets out how the statutory obligations will be delivered. The principles of Corporate Governance outlined in the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable have been consistently applied in the delivery of services within the portfolio.
The following areas of Sussex Police form my portfolio.
Alongside Operational Departments reporting in to me.
Each department works to ensure the Force meets the priorities set by the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner’s (Sussex PCC) Police and Crime Plan, published on the Sussex PCC’s website.
My portfolio covers the following areas of business:
The Code of Corporate Governance sets out a series of overarching strategic policies and operational documents for the force.
I am responsible for the operation, review, and evaluation of the following strategies:
I am responsible for the operation and review of the following policies:
I am responsible for ensuring that staff within my portfolio area adhere to the content and wording of these items. I can also confirm that all my departmental heads are aware of the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable where all such policies are recorded.
Internal Audit Scrutiny by Southern Internal Audit Partnership (SIAP) for Joint Sussex Police and Surrey Police Audits (SSP), Sussex only audit reviews (SX). All actions are being addressed.
Robust processes are in place to ensure that I am given assurance of governance and accountability across the Force. Divisions and departments are held to account through an agreed series of strategic force-level boards, chaired by Chief Officers. They report to me through the following meetings which I chair:
The Strategic Planning Board, which provides me with high level oversight of the Force’s financial, human resources and operational demand, scrutiny of the Force’s spending and savings plans and the impact of those plans on establishment and capability. The board:
The Force Performance Board provides efficient and effective corporate governance of Force performance through an established performance cycle and framework. Incorporating Crime Data Integrity as an integral part of the performance framework, it ensures accountability across the Force. The board:
The Organisational Reassurance Board (ORB) ensures the effective governance arrangements of each chief officer portfolio and that chief officers have proper regard for the operation of their respective responsibilities, evidenced through the regular update of their assurance statements. Additionally, the ORB is there to maintain the principles and standards of professional behaviour for policing by ensuring that relevant and proportionate risk, business continuity, research and environmental scanning functions are in place, are understood and actioned across Sussex Police and are shared with Surrey Police.
The Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Board is a strategic level meeting to provide assurance and demonstrate commitment in delivering the Force’s Equality Diversity and Inclusion Strategy, and meeting statutory obligations set out in the Equality Act 2010, with specific regard to Section 149 of the Public Sector Equality Duty, 2011. In addition, a new board entitled R.A.P.I.D (Race Action Plan Insight & Delivery) chair by the Assistant Chief Officer for Trust and Legitimacy, Anita Grant, is now live and ensures effective delivery of the joint race action plan with Surrey Police.
The Strategic Change Board, which I chair jointly with the Deputy Chief Constable of Surrey Police, reviews current portfolios & agrees business change priorities with a focus on cost, benefits, resilience, and operational risk. There is an annual planning cycle which decides & prioritises outline business cases and detailed business cases following approval. The board scrutinises delivery performance across portfolios, manages escalated risks, issues, and exception reports. Scheduling and resourcing implications of new initiatives are reviewed with a view to re-prioritising portfolio delivery where required. Benefits realisation is monitored and tracked alongside the financial plan and savings programme.
I also chair the annual Risk Assessment Assurance Panel. This process considers all Force strategic risks, the force appetite, reviewing controls in place and mitigating actions, internal governance structures and ascertains what external or independent scrutiny is in place. This allows the organisation to identify areas where further action may be required and provides an overview of all force risks and interdependencies.
To ensure appropriate oversight of the rolling programme of inspections conducted by His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue; advice and recommendations from the Independent Office for Police Conduct or via Super Complaints, Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office , and audits conducted by our Internal Auditors, with recommendations relevant to my portfolio are added to the Portfolio Risk Register.
Themes include PEEL Police Effectiveness Efficiency and Legitimacy, Abuse of Position and Vetting, misconduct and misogyny, Collaboration. In addition learning the lessons in relevant areas.
This is not an exhaustive list, as implementation of recommendations is a continual process, this is reviewed at the force Organisational Reassurance Board and relevant Accountability Boards, to ensure completion and assurance for this portfolio.
The Portfolio Risk Register identifies all risks that are relevant to the portfolio and which may affect the delivery of its objectives. Each risk has an identified owner and details the control measures in place to address the risk. There is a joint Risk Register maintained by Sussex and Surrey Police forces. Risks associated with collaborated functions are reported into each force. The risk register is reviewed on a regular basis at my portfolio meetings, scrutinised at both forces’ Organisational Reassurance Boards and reported into both forces’ Joint Audit Committees. Terms of reference and minutes of the Sussex Joint Audit Committee are published here:
https://www.sussex-pcc.gov.uk/the-pcc/transparency/audit-committee/
Controls have been identified that are designed to mitigate the risks identified in 6 above. Responsibility for the effective implementation of each control has been delegated to a nominated lead. Through the governance arrangements within my portfolio, assurance has been obtained, along with evidence from each nominated lead that the controls have been tested and are operating effectively.
I confirm that all my departmental heads are aware of the force’s Corporate Governance Framework, which includes the Financial Regulations and Contract Standing Orders.
Identified risks within my portfolio are reviewed by me on a regular basis. Those that are considered to be significant (red) are monitored on a regular basis through corporate meetings, including the Strategic Change Board and ORB and regularly updated and considered at the Strategic Chief Officer Meeting, chaired by the Chief Constable. In some circumstances, an action plan is produced to provide a more focused approach to a specific risk / gap. Continuous review of the progress of action plans takes place through the relevant chief officer’s portfolio meeting.
In my opinion, the internal control framework of the Deputy Chief Constable’s Portfolio is soundly based. All significant risks to the delivery of objectives have been identified and controls are in place to mitigate those risks.
Signed by
David McLaren
Deputy Chief Constable
Date: 16/04/2025
I have reviewed the statements contained above.
Signed by
Jo Shiner
Chief Constable
Date: 02/05/2025
1. Statutory obligations
All principal statutory obligations relating to my portfolio have been identified and are set out below:
The principles of Corporate Governance outlined in the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable have been consistently applied in the delivery of services within the portfolio.
The following areas of Sussex Police form my portfolio.
Each department works to ensure the Force meets the priorities set by the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner’s (Sussex PCC) Police and Crime Plan, published on the Sussex PCC’s website.
My portfolio covers the following areas of business:
The Code of Corporate Governance sets out a series of overarching strategic policies and operational documents for the force. I am responsible for the operation, review, and evaluation of the following strategies:
I am responsible for the operation and review of the following policies:
I am responsible for ensuring that staff within my portfolio area adhere to the content and wording of these items. I can also confirm that all my departmental heads are aware of the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable where all such policies are recorded.
Internal Audit Scrutiny by Southern Internal Audit Partnership (SIAP). All actions monitored via a relevant Accountability Board and subsequently the Force Organisational Reassurance Board.
There are processes in place across my portfolio ensuring governance arrangements are fit for purpose and that robust reviewing and monitoring mechanisms are in place which enables me to provide assurance to and be held accountable at the Force Performance Board and the Organisational Reassurance Board (ORB). Governance of my portfolio is provided at the strategic Local Policing Accountability Board (LPAB). Change projects related to Local Policing are governed through the Local Policing Unify Board (LPUB).
The progress and assurance regarding the portfolio is managed and addressed through the monthly LPAB meeting which the varying strands i.e. Response and Neighbourhood Policing report into. Findings and concerns are reported to me at the LPAB.
The Force is subject to regular inspections by His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue (HMICFRS) with the next report due in 2025. The action taken to respond to their recommendations and areas for improvement are closely monitored. Progress against these recommendations made is overseen at meetings held between departmental heads and myself, and they are only shown as complete once I have reviewed the action taken and I am satisfied that the recommendation or cause for concern has been met and resolved unless there are exceptional circumstances. Scrutiny of all HMICFRS recommendations and areas for improvement are also a standing agenda item at the LPAB.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) also make local and national recommendations, as well as identifying areas for improvement. These are monitored by the Risk Manager within Corporate Development Department. Daily Divisional and Departmental Management Meetings are held where local policing issues within the three Sussex Police divisions (East Sussex, West Sussex and Brighton & Hove) are considered and brought to my attention should there be immediate concerns. A similar structure is in place for any FCCCD issues.
A framework of meetings supports my portfolio. Each report into the LPAB.
Where necessary, to ensure appropriate oversight of actions arising from HMICRES, IOPC and internal auditors recommendations may be added to the Portfolio Risk Register.
This is reviewed at the force Organisational Reassurance Board and relevant Accountability Boards, to ensure completion and assurance for this portfolio.
The Portfolio Risk Register identifies all risks that are relevant to the portfolio, and which may affect the delivery of its objectives. Each risk has an identified owner and details the control measures in place to address the risk. The register is reviewed on a regular basis at my portfolio meetings, scrutinised at the force Organisational Reassurance Board and reported to the Joint Audit Committee. Terms of reference of the Joint Audit Committee are published are available on the PCC website.
The LPAB as the monthly meeting to monitor and assess the progress made to mitigate the risks identified within my portfolio.
Responsibility for the effective implementation of each control has been delegated to a nominated lead. Through the governance arrangements within my portfolio, assurance has been obtained through evidence from each nominated lead that the controls have been tested and are operating effectively.
I confirm that all my departmental heads are aware of the Force’s Corporate Governance Framework, which includes the Financial Regulations and Contract Standing Orders.
Identified risks within my portfolio are reviewed by me on a regular basis through corporate meetings, including the Organisational Reassurance Board and regularly updated and considered at the Strategic Chief Officer Meeting, chaired by the Chief Constable. In some circumstances, an action plan is produced to provide a more focused approach to a specific risk / gap. Continuous review of the progress of action plans takes place through the LPAB. Processes also include opportunities for external scrutiny of these risks.
In my opinion, the internal control framework of ACC Local Policing is soundly based. All significant risks to the delivery of objectives have been identified and controls are in place to mitigate those risks.
Signed by
Paul Court
Assistant Chief Constable, Local Policing
Date: 13/02/25
I have reviewed the statements contained above and the copy of the Portfolio Risk Register and relevant action plans.
Signed by
Dave McLaren
Deputy Chief Constable
Date: 13/05/2025
All principal statutory obligations relating to my portfolio have been identified and are set out below:
The framework clearly sets out how the statutory obligations will be delivered. The principles of Corporate Governance outlined in the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable have been consistently applied in the delivery of services within the portfolio.
The following areas of Sussex Police form my portfolio.
Each department works to ensure the Force meets the priorities set by the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner’s (Sussex PCC) Police and Crime Plan, published on the Sussex PCC’s website.
My portfolio covers the following areas of business:
National
Regional
The Code of Corporate Governance sets out a series of overarching strategic policies and operational documents for the force. I am responsible for the operation, review, and evaluation of the following strategies:
I am responsible for the operation and review of the following policies:
I am responsible for ensuring that staff within my portfolio area adhere to the content and wording of these items. I can also confirm that all my departmental heads are aware of the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable where all such policies are recorded.
The HMICFRS undertake regular inspections of the Force and also share national report recommendations.
Internal Audit Scrutiny by Southern Internal Audit Partnership (SIAP). All actions monitored via a relevant Accountability Board and subsequently the Force Organisational Reassurance Board.
There are processes in place across my portfolio area ensuring governance arrangements are fit for purpose and that robust reviewing and monitoring mechanisms are in place which enables me to provide assurance to and be held accountable at the Organisational Reassurance Board (ORB), Force Strategic Planning Board (SPB) and the Force Performance Board (FPB).
There is a framework of meetings supporting my portfolio, structured to report into my Portfolio Accountability meeting agendas include:
Processes are in place throughout my Operations Command and Protective Security portfolio to provide assurance. Senior Management Team meetings are held regularly to monitor performance and risks. Monthly finance, HR and Business Change are held to monitor financial, workforce and organisational matters.
The Force is subject to regular Inspections by His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue (HMICFRS) The action taken to respond to their recommendations and areas for improvement are closely monitored. Progress against these recommendations made is overseen at bespoke meetings held between departmental supervisors and myself, and they are only shown as complete once I have reviewed the action taken and am satisfied that the recommendation or cause for concern has been met and resolved unless there are exceptional circumstances. Scrutiny of all HMICFRS recommendations and areas for improvement are also a standing agenda item at the ACC Operations and Protective Security Accountability Meeting.
The other meetings that feed into my portfolio are:
To ensure appropriate oversight of the rolling programme of inspections conducted by His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue; advice and recommendations from the Independent Office for Police Conduct or via Super Complaints, Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office, and audits conducted by our Internal Auditors, with recommendations relevant to my portfolio are added to the Portfolio Risk Register.
Themes include PEEL Police Effectiveness Efficiency and Legitimacy, Policing in Pandemic, Disproportionate use of police powers, Roads Policing, Policing Protests. In addition, learning the lessons in relevant areas such as Stop Search and Roads Policing.
This is not an exhaustive list as implementation of recommendations is a continual process, this is reviewed at the force Organisational Reassurance Board and relevant Accountability Boards, to ensure completion and assurance for this portfolio.
The Portfolio Risk Register identifies all risks that are relevant to the portfolio, and which may affect the delivery of its objectives. Each risk has an identified owner and details the control measures in place to address the risk. There is a joint Risk Register maintained by Sussex and Surrey Police forces. Risks associated with collaborated functions are reported into each force. The risk register is reviewed on a regular basis at my portfolio meetings, scrutinised at both forces’ Organisational Reassurance Boards and reported into both forces’ Joint Audit Committees. Terms of reference and minutes of the Sussex Joint Audit Committee are published on the PCC website.
Controls have been identified that are designed to mitigate the risks identified in 6 above. Responsibility for the effective implementation of each control has been delegated to a nominated lead. Through the governance arrangements within my portfolio, assurance has been obtained, along with evidence from each nominated lead that the controls have been tested and are operating effectively.
I confirm that all my assigned leads are aware of the force’s Corporate Governance Framework, which includes the Financial Regulations and Contract Standing Orders.
Identified risks within my portfolio are reviewed by me on a regular basis. Those that are considered to be significant (red) are monitored on a regular basis through corporate meetings, including the Strategic Change Board and ORB and regularly updated and considered at the Strategic Chief Officer Meeting, chaired by the Chief Constable. In some circumstances, an action plan is produced to provide a more focused approach to a specific risk / gap. Continuous review of the progress of action plans takes place through the relevant chief officer’s portfolio meeting.
In my opinion, the internal control framework of the Operations Command Portfolio is soundly based. All significant risks to the delivery of objectives have been identified and controls are in place to mitigate those risks.
Signed by
Steve Rayland
Assistant Chief Constable, Operations Command
Date: 03/03/2025
I have reviewed the statements contained above and the copy of the Portfolio Risk Register and relevant action plans.
Signed by
Dave McLaren
Deputy Chief Constable
Date: 13/05/2025
All principal statutory obligations relating to my portfolio have been identified and are set out below:
The framework clearly sets out how the statutory obligations will be delivered. The principles of Corporate Governance outlined in the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable have been consistently applied in the delivery of services within the portfolio.
The following areas of Sussex Police form my portfolio.
Each department works to ensure the Force meets the priorities set by the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner’s (Sussex PCC) Police and Crime Plan, published on the Sussex PCC’s website.
My portfolio covers the following areas of business:
The Code of Corporate Governance sets out a series of overarching strategic policies and operational documents for the force. I am responsible for the operation, review, and evaluation of the following strategies:
I am responsible for the operation and review of the following policies:
I am responsible for ensuring that staff within my portfolio area adhere to the content and wording of these items. I can also confirm that all my departmental heads are aware of the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable where all such policies are recorded.
The HMICFRS undertake regular inspections of the Force and also share national report recommendations. Internal Audit Scrutiny by Southern Internal Audit Partnership (SIAP) for Joint Sussex Police and Surrey Police Audits (SSP), Sussex only audit reviews (SX). All actions are being addressed.
HMICFRS specific areas
Internal Audit areas
Any other sources of assurance
There are robust processes in place across my portfolio to give assurance that effective governance and accountability is in place across all my areas of business. The Criminal Justice and Custody Accountability Board covers performance and accountability mechanisms that feed into these processes which give me the information needed for this assurance. This in turn allows me to be held accountable and provide assurance to the:
In addition, the governance in place allows me to provide reassurance to the above boards is through the:
Further to the above formal structures, I also hold weekly meetings with the Chief Superintendents and Superintendents responsible for their relevant command areas. These meetings are supported by written updates and relevant details are then aired and discussed at the weekly OCOM/SCOM meetings.
To ensure appropriate oversight of the rolling programme of inspections conducted by His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue; advice and recommendations from the Independent Office for Police Conduct or via Super Complaints, Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office, and audits conducted by our Internal Auditors, with recommendations relevant to my portfolio are added to the Portfolio Risk Register.
Themes include casefile preparation and quality as a key part of the improvements around investigating crime and improvements in victim services to reduce attrition and ensure victim decisions are recorded accurately.
This is not an exhaustive list, as implementation of recommendations is a continual process, this is reviewed at the relevant portfolio management meetings before further scrutiny at the force Organisational Reassurance Board and relevant Accountability Boards, to ensure completion and assurance for this portfolio.
The Portfolio Risk Register identifies all risks that are relevant to the portfolio and which may affect the delivery of its objectives. Each risk has an identified owner and details the control measures in place to address the risk. There is a joint Risk Register maintained by Sussex and Surrey Police forces. Risks associated with collaborated functions are reported into each force. The risk register is reviewed on a regular basis at my portfolio meetings, scrutinised at both forces’ Organisational Reassurance Boards and reported into both forces’ Joint Audit Committees. Terms of reference and minutes of the Sussex Joint Audit Committee are published on the PCC website.
Controls have been identified that are designed to mitigate the risks identified in 6 above. Responsibility for the effective implementation of each control has been delegated to a nominated lead. Through the governance arrangements within my portfolio, assurance has been obtained, along with evidence from each nominated lead that the controls have been tested and are operating effectively.
I confirm that all my departmental heads are aware of the force’s Corporate Governance Framework, which includes the Financial Regulations and Contract Standing Orders.
Identified risks within my portfolio are reviewed by me on a regular basis. Those that are considered to be significant (red) are monitored on a regular basis through corporate meetings, including the Strategic Planning Board and ORB and regularly updated and considered at the Strategic Chief Officer Meeting, chaired by the Chief Constable. In some circumstances, an action plan is produced to provide a more focused approach to a specific risk / gap. Continuous review of the progress of action plans takes place through the relevant chief officer’s portfolio meeting.
In my opinion, the internal control framework of the Criminal Justice, Transformation and Misconduct Hearings Portfolios are soundly based. All significant risks to the delivery of objectives have been identified and controls are in place to mitigate those risks.
Signed by
Peter Gardner
Assistant Chief Constable, Criminal Justice and Custody, Surrey and Sussex Police
Date: 28/04/2025
I have reviewed the statements contained above and the copy of the portfolio’s risk register.
Signed by
Dave McLaren
Deputy Chief Constable
Date: 13/05/2025
All principal statutory obligations relating to my portfolio have been identified and are set out below:
The framework clearly sets out how the statutory obligations will be delivered. The principles of Corporate Governance outlined in the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable have been consistently applied in the delivery of services within the portfolio.
The following areas of Sussex Police form my portfolio.
Each department works to ensure the Force meets the priorities set by the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner’s (Sussex PCC) Police and Crime Plan, published on the Sussex PCC’s website.
My portfolio covers the following areas of business:
The Code of Corporate Governance sets out a series of overarching strategic policies and operational documents for the force. I am responsible for the operation, review, and evaluation of the following strategies:
I am responsible for ensuring that staff within my portfolio area adhere to the content and wording of these items. I can also confirm that all my departmental heads are aware of the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable where all such policies are recorded.
I am responsible for the operation and review of the following policies:
The HMICFRS undertake regular inspections of the Force and also share national report recommendations, alongside other external organisations.
Internal Audit Scrutiny by Southern Internal Audit Partnership (SIAP). All actions monitored via a relevant Accountability Board and subsequently the Force Organisational Reassurance Board.
There are processes in place across my portfolio ensuring governance arrangements are fit for purpose and that robust reviewing and monitoring mechanisms are in place which enables me to provide assurance to and be held accountable at the at the Organisational Reassurance Board (ORB), Force Strategic Planning Board (SPB) and the Force Performance Board (FPB). Governance of my portfolio is provided at the Senior Leadership Accountability Meeting, , the Forensic Accountability Board and the Vulnerability Board.
The risk of non-compliance of Force policies within my portfolio area has and will result in audits and dip checking of the action taken by officers and staff by the departmental supervision responsible for the policy. Findings and concerns are reported to me via the relevant Accountability Board.
The Force is subject to regular Inspections by His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue (HMICFRS). The action taken to respond to their recommendations and areas for improvement are closely monitored. Progress against these recommendations made is overseen at bespoke meetings held between departmental supervisors and myself, and they are only shown as complete once I have reviewed the action taken and am satisfied that the recommendation or cause for concern has been met and resolved unless there are exceptional circumstances. Scrutiny of all HMICFRS recommendations and areas for improvement are also a standing agenda item at the Vulnerability Board and SCC & PP SLT meetings.
Additional processes are in place throughout my Specialist Crime Command and Public Protection portfolio to provide assurance. Senior Management Team meetings are held regularly to monitor performance. Monthly Finance and Human Resources Meetings are held to monitor financial and workforce matters (e.g. wellbeing and training compliance). This includes a Surrey and Sussex Vulnerability Board, and collaborative SLT meeting and a collaborative Forensic Accountability Meeting.
Through a robust framework of meetings, outlined below, to ensure there is corporate oversight of management activity. This includes compliance assessments, reviews of policy implementation, setting and monitoring of internal guidelines.
I am Chair for the following:
I attend the following:
To ensure appropriate oversight of the rolling programme of inspections conducted by His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue; advice and recommendations from the Independent Office for Police Conduct or via Super Complaints, and audits conducted by our Internal Auditors, with recommendations relevant to my portfolio are added to the Portfolio Risk Register.
Themes include PEEL Police Effectiveness Efficiency and Legitimacy, Policing in Pandemic, Domestic Abuse in the Pandemic, Pre-charge bail and released under investigation, Police and CPS response to crimes against older people, Police and CPS response to rape, Use of protective measures including in cases involving violence against women and girls, Response to violence against women and girls, criminal justice journey for individuals with mental health needs and disorders, Online Child Sexual Exploitation and MAPPA multi-agency public protection arrangements. In addition, learning the lessons in areas such as Child Sexual Abuse and Protecting Vulnerable People. Additional themes for the special crime command portfolio include, IPCO inspection report, Fraud, Cyber Crime, Regional Organised Crime Units, Burglary robbery and acquisitive crime and Digital Forensics. In addition, learning the lessons in relevant areas.
This is not an exhaustive list, as implementation of recommendations is a continual process, this is reviewed at the force Organisational Reassurance Board and relevant Accountability Boards, to ensure completion and assurance for this portfolio.
The Portfolio Risk Register identifies all risks that are relevant to the portfolio and which may affect the delivery of its objectives. Each risk has an identified owner and details the control measures in place to address the risk. There is a joint Risk Register maintained by Sussex and Surrey Police forces. Risks associated with collaborated functions are reported into each force. The risk register is reviewed on a regular basis at my portfolio meetings, scrutinised at both forces’ Organisational Reassurance Boards and reported into both forces’ Joint Audit Committees. Terms of reference and minutes of the Sussex Joint Audit Committee are published on the PCC website.
Controls have been identified that are designed to mitigate the risks identified in 6 above. Responsibility for the effective implementation of each control has been delegated to a nominated lead. Through the governance arrangements within my portfolio, assurance has been obtained, along with evidence from each nominated lead that the controls have been tested and are operating effectively.
I confirm that all my xxx are aware of the force’s Corporate Governance Framework, which includes the Financial Regulations and Contract Standing Orders.
Identified risks within my portfolio are reviewed by me on a regular basis. Those that are considered to be significant (red) are monitored on a regular basis through corporate meetings, including the Strategic Change Board and ORB and regularly updated and considered at the Strategic Chief Officer Meeting, chaired by the Chief Constable. In some circumstances, an action plan is produced to provide a more focused approach to a specific risk / gap. Continuous review of the progress of action plans takes place through the relevant chief officer’s portfolio meeting.
In my opinion, the internal control framework of my Portfolio is soundly based. All significant risks to the delivery of objectives have been identified and controls are in place to mitigate those risks.
Signed by
Tanya Jones
Assistant Chief Constable, Surrey Police and Sussex Police – Specialist Crime Command and Public Protection.
Date: 15/04/2025
I have reviewed the statements contained above and the copy of the portfolio’s risk register.
Signed by
Dave McLaren
Deputy Chief Constable
Date: 13/05/2025
All principal statutory obligations relating to my portfolio have been identified and are set out below:
The framework clearly sets out how the statutory obligations will be delivered. The principles of Corporate Governance outlined in the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable have been consistently applied in the delivery of services within the portfolio.
The following areas form the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) portfolio.
Each area works to meet the objectives set by the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner’s Crime Plan.
The CFO portfolio covers the following areas of business:
The Code of Corporate Governance sets out a series of overarching strategic policies and operational documents for the force. I am responsible for the operation and review of the following:
Please refer to the following appendices for additional information:
Processes are in place throughout the CFO portfolio to provide effective assurance. Through these meetings I am equipped with information to ensure I can be held to account for my portfolio at Force-level meetings of Surrey Police and Sussex Police, including PEEL (force performance) meetings, the Surrey Police and Sussex Police Organisational Reassurance Boards, the joint CFO Board, Chief Officer Meetings, the joint Portfolio Strategy Board and Joint Chief Officer Meeting (JCOM), the Surrey Police Force Organisation Board and Sussex Police Strategic Planning Board, and by the Police & Crime Commissioners of Surrey Police and Sussex Police.
To ensure appropriate oversight of the rolling programme of inspections conducted by His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue; advice and recommendations from the Independent Office for Police Conduct or via Super Complaints, Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office, and audits conducted by our Internal Auditors, with recommendations relevant to my portfolio are added to the Portfolio Risk Register.
Themes include PEEL Police Effectiveness Efficiency and Legitimacy. In addition, learning the lessons in relevant areas.
This is not an exhaustive list, as implementation of recommendations is a continual process, this is reviewed at the force Organisational Reassurance Board and relevant Accountability Boards, to ensure completion and assurance for this portfolio.
Evidence Informed Policing & research projects
The Forces played a key role in developing and rolling out the ‘Achieving Finance Excellence in Policing’ (AFEP) programme - representing national best practice for financial management, data, people development and audit/governance.
The Forces continues to deliver Financial Management and Governance in line with CIPFA best practice and bound by the principles of managing public money. The aim is to continuously improve approaches and processes to achieve financial health within the Forces and throughout the sector.
The Portfolio Risk Register identifies all risks that are relevant to the portfolio, and which may affect the delivery of objectives within the portfolio. Each risk has an identified owner and details the control measures in place to address the risk. A joint Risk Register is maintained across the two police forces. Risks associated with collaborated functions are reported into each force. Risks that are relevant to the CFO portfolio, and which may affect the delivery of its objectives or the force financial objectives, are reviewed on a regular basis at my portfolio meeting, scrutinised at both forces’ Organisational Reassurance Boards and reported into both forces’ Joint Audit Committees. Terms of reference and minutes of the Sussex Joint Audit Committee are published on the PCC website.
Controls have been identified that are designed to mitigate risks identified. Responsibility for the effective implementation of each control has been delegated to a nominated lead. Through the governance and one to one processes within the portfolio, assurance has been obtained, along with evidence from each nominated lead that the controls have been tested and are operating effectively.
I confirm that all my departmental heads are aware of the force’s Corporate Governance Framework, which includes the Financial Regulations and Contract Standing Orders.
Identified risks within my portfolio are reviewed by me on a regular basis. Those that are considered to be significant (red) are monitored on a regular basis through corporate meetings, CFO meetings and the Organisational Reassurance Boards, and regularly updated and where appropriate considered at the Strategic Chief Officer Meeting, chaired by the Chief Constable. In some circumstances, an action plan is produced to provide a more focused approach to a specific risk / gap, delivered via a Gold Group oversight structure. Continuous review of the progress of action plans takes place through my portfolio meeting.
In my opinion, the internal control framework of the CFO Portfolio is soundly based. All significant risks to the delivery of objectives have been identified and controls are in place to mitigate those risks.
Signed by
Peter Appleton Chief Financial Officer
Date: 15/04/2025
I have reviewed the statements contained above and the copy of the Portfolio Risk Register and Action Plan.
Signed by
David McLaren
Deputy Chief Constable
Sussex Police
Date: 13/05/2025
Appendix 1
Financial Management
The following principal statutory obligations relating to the Financial Management aspect of my portfolio have been identified and are set out below:
Finance
The Code of Corporate Governance sets out a series of overarching strategic policies and operational documents for the provision of Financial Management of the Force. I am responsible for the operation and review of the following policies:
These policies cover Financial Regulation within the force, Contract Standing Orders, Reserves, Budget Preparation, Budget Monitoring, Budget Management, Capital Accounting, Banking & Imprest, Asset Inventory, Accounting, Asset Purchase & Disposal, and Invoices & Debt Recovery, use of vehicles and estates matters.
Insurance Obligations
As public bodies, Sussex Police and Surrey Police have no statutory requirement to hold any insurance cover, however, it does have a responsibility to manage an appropriate and effective programme of risk transfer and risk retention, in order to protect the organisations’ budgets.
Sussex Police and Surrey Police also have a responsibility to minimise the cost of losses by handling insurance claims effectively and recovering the organisations’ outlay where possible. In addition to those obligations, Sussex Police and Surrey Police do also hold Public Liability Insurance.
Finance Operations
The Payment Terms Act 2017 sets the statutory payments terms to 30 days in the UK. This implies that the invoice must be paid within 30 days from the receipt of the invoice, unless other arrangements have been agreed upon by the parties. In some cases, the payment terms can be reduced, providing all parties are in agreement. If invoices are not paid within 30 days, then statutory interest becomes due.
Appendix 2
Procurement
The following principal statutory obligations relating to the Procurement aspect of my portfolio have been identified and are set out below:
The Code of Corporate Governance sets out a series of overarching strategic policies and operational documents for the provision of Procurement for the Force. I am responsible for the operation and review of the following:
Statutory obligations
All principal statutory obligations relating to my portfolio have been identified and are set out below:
The framework clearly sets out how the statutory obligations will be delivered. The principles of Corporate Governance outlined in the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable have been consistently applied in the delivery of services within the portfolio.
The following areas of Sussex Police form my portfolio.
Digital Data and Technology (DDaT) is a support function that provides and maintains systems and technology across all departments of Surrey and Sussex Police Forces and their collaborated areas. DDaT supports all other areas of the business, with a specific focus on value for money and enabling the development of partnerships. The department works to meet the priorities set by the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner’s and Surrey Police & Crime Commissioner’s Police and Crime Plans, published on the PCC website.
My portfolio covers the following areas of business:
The Code of Corporate Governance sets out a series of overarching strategic policies and operational documents for the force.
I am responsible for the operation, review, and evaluation of the following strategies:
I am responsible for the operation and review of the following policies:
I am responsible for ensuring that staff within my portfolio area adhere to the content and wording of these items. I can also confirm that all my departmental heads are aware of the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable where all such policies are recorded.
The HMICFRS undertake regular inspections of the Force and also share national report recommendations. The Force has also been subject to scrutiny by Police Digital Services via the Security Assessment for Policing Annual report to the SIRO.
Internal Audit areas
Internal Audit Scrutiny by Southern Internal Audit Partnership (SIAP). All actions monitored via a relevant Accountability Board and subsequently the Force Organisational Reassurance Board.
Any other sources of assurance
Processes are in place to ensure that I am given assurance of governance and accountability. The Accountability and Performance Boards within my portfolio provide me with high level oversight over both the implementation of portfolios strategies and the identification and mitigation of risk.
To ensure appropriate oversight of the rolling programme of inspections conducted by His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue; advice and recommendations from the Independent Office for Police Conduct or via Super Complaints, Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office, and audits conducted by our Internal Auditors, with recommendations relevant to my portfolio are added to the Portfolio Risk Register.
Themes include:
This is not an exhaustive list, as implementation of recommendations is a continual process, this is reviewed at the force Organisational Reassurance Board and relevant Accountability Boards, to ensure completion and assurance for this portfolio.
The Portfolio Risk Register identifies all risks that are relevant to the portfolio and which may affect the delivery of its objectives. Each risk has an identified owner and details the control measures in place to address the risk. There is a joint Risk Register maintained by Sussex and Surrey Police forces. Risks associated with collaborated functions are reported into each force. The risk register is reviewed on a regular basis at my portfolio meetings, scrutinised at both forces’ Organisational Reassurance Boards and reported into both forces’ Joint Audit Committees. Terms of reference and minutes of the Sussex Joint Audit Committee are published on the PCC website.
Controls have been identified that are designed to mitigate the risks identified in 6 above. Responsibility for the effective implementation of each control has been delegated to a nominated lead. Through the governance arrangements within my portfolio, assurance has been obtained, along with evidence from each nominated lead that the controls have been tested and are operating effectively.
I confirm that all my nominated leads are aware of the force’s Corporate Governance Framework, which includes the Financial Regulations and Contract Standing Orders.
Identified risks within my portfolio are reviewed by me on a regular basis. Those that are considered to be significant (red) are monitored on a regular basis through corporate meetings, including the Strategic Change Board and ORB and regularly updated and considered at the Strategic Chief Officer Meeting, chaired by the Chief Constable. In some circumstances, an action plan is produced to provide a more focused approach to a specific risk / gap. Continuous review of the progress of action plans takes place through the relevant chief officer’s portfolio meeting.
In my opinion, the internal control framework of the Chief Operating Officer portfolio is soundly based. All significant risks to the delivery of objectives have been identified and controls are in place to mitigate those risks.
Signed by
Anthony Croxford
Chief Operating Officer
Date: 15/04/2025
I have reviewed the statements contained above and the copy of the portfolio’s risk register.
Signed by
Dave McLaren
Deputy Chief Constable
Date: 13/05/2025
Appendix 1
Joint Transport Service
The following principal statutory obligations relating to the provision of Joint Transport Service aspect of my portfolio have been identified and are set out below:
Joint Transport Services Primary Legislation
Secondary Legislation applicable to Joint Transport Services
Health and Safety Guidance (Approved Codes of Practice) that apply to Joint Transport Services
These Health and Safety Approved Codes of Practice (ACOPs) have Quasi Legal Status in that Sussex Police does not have to follow this guidance; however they must be able to evidence how their work practices achieve the required standard detailed within the guidance and are therefore included here.
The Code of Corporate Governance sets out a series of overarching strategic policies and operational documents for the provision of Transport Services for the Force. I am responsible for the operation and review of the following:
Appendix 2
Estates & Facilities Management
The following principal statutory obligations relating to the Estates & Facilities Management aspect of my portfolio have been identified and are set out below:
of Fire and Rescue Authorities)] –responsible for fire safety on Crown property
Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Regulations 1998
Estates and Facilities Primary Legislation
The Code of Corporate Governance sets out a series of overarching strategic policies and operational documents for the provision of Transport Services for the Force. I am responsible for the operation and review of the following:
The following services are maintained under this aspect of the Portfolio
Cleaning & Waste Management
Cleaning Services, Cleaning Consumables, Window Cleaning Services, Feminine Hygiene Services, Laundry Services, WEEE Waste, Clinical/Cytotoxic Waste, Furniture Disposal, Pest Control, Snow clearance and gritting, First Aid Box Management, Hazardous Waste Licences.
Customer Support Services
Building Health & Safety and Security checks, Helpdesk, Corporate Reception to HQ, ID card issuing, Lost property, Internal Planting, Grounds maintenance/Landscaping, Locksmith Services, Re-Glazing Services, Signage, Vehicle Parking Management, Visitors and Contractor Parking, Taxis, Travel & Hotel bookings, Locker Management, Pool cars, Catering, Vending, Photocopier and consumable Management, Stationery and Paper Management, Raising Purchase Orders, TV Licence Management, Performing Rights Licences, Cash Storage and Management, Recharge Management, Fire Fighting Equipment.
Security
Intruder Alarms, Building & Staff Security, Manned Guarding, Access Control Administration, Site CCTV Management, Locking & Unlocking,
Distribution Services
Despatch Services – Goods Inward & Outward, Uniform Stores, Mail - Scanning, Incoming & Outgoing post and couriers, Room Configuration, Office Moves and Churn, Portering.
Emergency Planning
Business Continuity Plan Department & Strategic Co-ordination Centre, Emergency Evacuation of Building tests.
Estates
Estate Asset Management, Statutory Maintenance, Planned Maintenance, Reactive Maintenance, Fire Risk Assessments, Legionella Water Management, Asbestos Management, Health & Safety Surveys, Building and M&E condition surveys. Lightning Protection, Minor Building Alterations Refurbishments, CAD Planning, Emergency call out provision, Building Management Systems, Potable water management, Five-year Maintenance Plan, Permits to Work, Risk Assessment Method Statements, Minor Construction Phase Plans and Access Permits, Fuel Tank Management, Property Valuation Management, Business Rates, Site Acquisitions and Disposals, Leases and Licences, Rent Negotiations,
General Services
Uniform Stores, Receipt of Evidence, Storage of Evidence, Return of goods, Disposal of goods, Estates and Facilities Contractor Management.
Income Generation
Community Infrastructure Levy and Section 106 submissions, External lets, Radio Mast management, Property Rentals, Car Parking income, Solar energy income, Electric Vehicle income, Sales income (eBay) and eBay sales and professional services.
Compliance & Quality
Estates National Benchmarking, Energy and Carbon Management, Sustainability & Environmental Management, Carbon Net Zero, Freedom of Information, Reporting & Dashboards, invoicing Rents & Services.
All principal statutory obligations relating to my portfolio have been identified and are set out below:
All principal statutory obligations relating to my portfolio have been identified, many of which are regulated and governed by statute. These include the areas around Employment Law, Equality, Human Rights and finance and payroll legislation pertaining to the employment of staff and officers. In addition, my portfolio is regulated and governed by Police Regulations.
The framework clearly sets out how the statutory obligations will be delivered. The principles of Corporate Governance outlined in the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable have been consistently applied in the delivery of services within the portfolio.
The following areas form my portfolio:
Each area works to meet the objectives set by the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner’s and Surrey Police & Crime Commissioner’s Police and Crime Plan.
My portfolio covers the following areas of business:
People Operations
HR Strategy and Projects
Resourcing & Talent
Learning and Professional Development
Occupational Health and Wellbeing
Centre of Excellence
Sussex Police Charitable Trust
The Code of Corporate Governance sets out a series of overarching strategic policies and operational documents for the force.
I am responsible for the operation, review, and evaluation of the following:
As detailed in the Code of Corporate Governance, I am responsible for the operation and review of the following policies:
I am responsible for ensuring that staff within my portfolio area adhere to the content and wording of these items. I can also confirm that all my departmental heads are aware of the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable where all such policies are recorded.
SIAP Audits:
Processes are in place throughout People Services to provide effective assurance. I hold Senior Management Team meetings on a fortnightly basis at which all Heads of Departments attend. The Heads of Departments hold their own team meetings to ensure that they are up to date with key issues and risks and are abreast of all future developments. I chair a Joint Wellbeing Board and a Quarterly Delivery Plan Review meeting to review our progress against the agreed deliverables for People Services. My Senior Management Team chair on my behalf the People Performance Meeting (formerly Capacity & Capability Board), People Services Operations and Leads meetings to build relationships, agree priorities, discuss service issues, and people development.
Through these meetings I am equipped with the right information to ensure I can be held to account for People Services activities at Force-level meetings of Surrey Police and Sussex Police, including PEEL meetings, the Surrey Police and Sussex Police Organisational Reassurance Boards, Chief Officer Meetings, the Strategic Change Board and PCC Governance Board.
To ensure appropriate oversight of the rolling programme of inspections conducted by His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue; advice and recommendations from the Independent Office for Police Conduct or via Super Complaints, and audits conducted by our Internal Auditors, with recommendations relevant to my portfolio are added to the Portfolio Risk Register.
This is not an exhaustive list, as implementation of recommendations is a continual process, this is reviewed at the force Organisational Reassurance Board and relevant Accountability Boards, to ensure completion and assurance for this portfolio.
The Portfolio Risk Register identifies all risks that are relevant to the portfolio, and which may affect the delivery of objectives within the portfolio. Each risk has an identified owner and details the control measures in place to address the risk. A joint Risk Register is maintained across both police forces. Risks associated with collaborated functions are reported into each force. Risks that are relevant to the People Services portfolio, and which may affect the delivery of its objectives, are reviewed on a regular basis at my portfolio meeting, scrutinised at both forces’ Organisational Reassurance Boards and reported into both forces’ Joint Audit Committees. Terms of reference and minutes of the Sussex Joint Audit Committee are published on the PCC website.
Controls have been identified that are designed to mitigate the risks identified within my portfolio. Responsibility for the effective implementation of each control has been delegated to a nominated lead. Through the governance arrangements within my portfolio, assurance has been obtained, along with evidence from each nominated lead that the controls have been tested and are operating effectively.
I confirm that all my departmental heads are aware of the force’s Corporate Governance Framework, which includes the Financial Regulations and Contract Standing Orders.
Identified risks within my portfolio are reviewed by me on a regular basis. Those that are considered to be significant (red) are monitored on a regular basis through corporate meetings, including the Organisational Reassurance Board and regularly updated and where relevant considered at the Strategic Chief Officer Meeting, chaired by the Chief Constable. In some circumstances, an action plan is produced to provide a more focused approach to a specific risk / gap. Continuous review of the progress of action plans takes place through my portfolio meeting.
In my opinion, the internal control framework of the People Services Portfolio is soundly based. All significant risks to the delivery of objectives have been identified and controls are in place to mitigate those risks.
Signed by
Adrian Rutherford
Director of People Services, Surrey and Sussex
Date: 21/02/2025
I have reviewed the statements contained above and the copy of the Portfolio Risk Register and relevant action plans.
Signed by
David McLaren
Deputy Chief Constable
Date: 13/05/2025
All principal statutory obligations relating to my portfolio have been identified and are set out below:
The framework clearly sets out how the statutory obligations will be delivered. The principles of Corporate Governance outlined in the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable have been consistently applied in the delivery of services within the portfolio.
The following areas of Sussex Police form my portfolio.
Each department works to ensure the Force meets the priorities set by the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner’s (Sussex PCC) Police and Crime Plan, published on the Sussex PCC’s website.
My portfolio covers the following areas of business:
The Code of Corporate Governance sets out a series of overarching strategic policies and operational documents for the force.
I am responsible for the operation, review, and evaluation of the following strategies:
I am responsible for the operation and review of the following policies:
I am responsible for ensuring that staff within my portfolio area adhere to the content and wording of these items. I can also confirm that all my departmental heads are aware of the Code of Corporate Governance for the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner and the Chief Constable where all such policies are recorded.
The HMICFRS undertake regular inspections of the Force and also share national report recommendations. Internal Audit Scrutiny by Southern Internal Audit Partnership (SIAP) for Joint Sussex Police and Surrey Police Audits (SSP), Sussex only audit reviews (SX). All actions are either implemented or being addressed.
HMICFRS specific areas
Internal Audit areas
Any other sources of assurance
Robust processes are in place to ensure that I am given assurance of governance and accountability for Trust and Legitimacy.
The R.A.P.I.D (Race Action Plan Insight & Delivery) Board provides me with high level oversight of the Force Race Action Plan.
The board:
RAPID (Race Action Plan Insights and Delivery) Insights meeting
"Sprints" meeting – Chaired by Deputy Chief Constable
Race Advisory Group – Chaired by external member of the public
Race Working Group – Chaired by Sussex Police Race Equality Champion
Race Equality Advocates
Community Engagement Advisors (CEA)
Single point of contact for questions, queries and to share best practice when staff and officers are out and engaging with communities.
Race Equality Network (REN)
The REN is Sussex Police's association for officers and staff of all races. It aims to empower employees to challenge, understand and improve issues associated with race and ethnicity as part of its mission to actively seek cultural change, be honoured to be different and to inspire others to be proud of their differences.
External Scrutiny Panels
Independent scrutiny panels form a pillar for delivering Sussex Police’s Community Engagement Strategy.
An Equality, Diversity and Inclusion report is submitted to the Organisational Reassurance Board on a 6 monthly basis and annually to the Force Joint Audit Committee.
To ensure appropriate oversight of the rolling programme of inspections conducted by His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue; advice and recommendations from the Independent Office for Police Conduct or via Super Complaints, Investigatory Powers Commissioner’s Office, and audits conducted by our Internal Auditors, with recommendations relevant to my portfolio are added to the Portfolio Risk Register.
Themes include:
This is not an exhaustive list, as implementation of recommendations is a continual process, this is reviewed at the force Organisational Reassurance Board and relevant Accountability Boards, to ensure completion and assurance for this portfolio.
The Portfolio Risk Register identifies all risks that are relevant to the portfolio and which may affect the delivery of its objectives. Each risk has an identified owner and details the control measures in place to address the risk. There is a joint Risk Register maintained by Sussex and Surrey Police forces. Risks associated with collaborated functions are reported into each force. The risk register is reviewed on a regular basis at my portfolio meetings, scrutinised at both forces’ Organisational Reassurance Boards and reported into both forces’ Joint Audit Committees. Terms of reference and minutes of the Sussex Joint Audit Committee are published on the PCC website.
Controls have been identified that are designed to mitigate the risks identified in 6 above. Responsibility for the effective implementation of each control has been delegated to a nominated lead. Through the governance arrangements within my portfolio, assurance has been obtained, along with evidence from each nominated lead that the controls have been tested and are operating effectively.
I confirm that all my direct reports are aware of the force’s Corporate Governance Framework, which includes the Financial Regulations and Contract Standing Orders.
Identified risks within my portfolio are reviewed by me on a regular basis. Those that are considered to be significant (red) are monitored on a regular basis through corporate meetings, including the Strategic Change Board and ORB and regularly updated and considered at the Strategic Chief Officer Meeting, chaired by the Chief Constable. In some circumstances, an action plan is produced to provide a more focused approach to a specific risk / gap. Continuous review of the progress of action plans takes place through the relevant chief officer’s portfolio meeting.
In my opinion, the internal control framework of the Trust and Legitimacy Portfolio is soundly based. All significant risks to the delivery of objectives have been identified and controls are in place to mitigate those risks.
Signed by
Anita Grant
Assistant Chief Officer Trust and Legitimacy
Date: 06/03/2025
I have reviewed the statements contained above and the copy of the portfolio’s risk register.
Signed by
Dave McLaren
Deputy Chief Constable
Date: 13/05/2025